|
Post by bluelenton on Jul 17, 2010 16:47:32 GMT
Hi Phil Very well played and a really good sound from the G2Nu, Charlie should be pleased with the result of the G2Nu patches.
Rgds John
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Hall on Jul 20, 2010 12:04:07 GMT
Hi Phil, Just had chance to listen to sound files after being without access to my usual listening equipment for over a week. Thanks for recording and posting these files. I am pleased with the sound. I am just wondering if there is enough echo for these recordings. When playing live (ie. when not recording), does that still seem the case? They seemed about right when I play tested them for the final time before releasing the files. Regards, Charlie
|
|
|
Post by philbarker on Jul 20, 2010 17:14:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by philbarker on Jul 20, 2010 17:23:35 GMT
Charlie When playing live and recording I have since noticed that the echoes/sounds etc can be enhanced/improved by tweaking the amp's settings as you advise in your preamble. Phil
|
|
|
Post by Len on Jul 21, 2010 0:41:01 GMT
Hi Phil,
I like the sound of the two files. If I were to buy a echo type unit, I would probably get one of the newer ones from Zoom as they seem to be reasonably cheap to buy and relatively easy to obtain. I was wondering if they are easy to program and if they have enough space for patches, including Charlie's EFTP of course. How do they compare with a Magicstomp or the Alesis units for example? I'm not sure whether you can answer these questions but perhaps someone can.
Regards, Len
|
|
|
Post by philbarker on Jul 21, 2010 8:04:13 GMT
Len The new Zoom G2Nu is certainly acceptable as a low cost entry to obtain EFTP. It is not as good as the Magicstomp and I suspect most of the Alesis units. It is very easy to program and has plenty of room to store both EFTP patches and your own. You can also switch between different banks of patches, so in theory the amount of patch storage is infinite. Since posting the files I have found that by tweaking the amp and patches, even Charlie’s to a degree, a very acceptable sound can be obtained. On balance I would say it is perhaps on par with the Zoom RFX 2000 but others may disagree as is their privilege. Regards Phil
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Hall on Jul 21, 2010 15:11:37 GMT
Hi Phil, Thanks for your opinion of making improvements with amp settings. What kind of tweaks did you try with the patches? Regards, Charlie
|
|
|
Post by philbarker on Jul 21, 2010 16:52:54 GMT
Charlie I fiddle with the EFTP patches on the G2Nu either by enabling the comp mode and/or the booster mode in EFX and then using their attributes to experiment with different sounds. I also fiddle with your EQ settings as well but all the time making sure the changes don’t affect the EFTP echo and other effect sounds (Tape Echo/Reverb etc) which I don’t touch. I think it’s all down to what sound suits our individual hearing. Phil
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Hall on Jul 21, 2010 20:14:00 GMT
Hi Phil, Thanks for letting me know about the tweaks. So in your opinion, do the EQ changes help to enhance the effective echo amount perceived? Regards, Charlie
|
|
|
Post by philbarker on Jul 22, 2010 14:44:02 GMT
Charlie I think it is all about perception as you say. To my ears the tweaks I make improve the sound for me at the time I make them. Since putting my Fender Super Champ XD back in the line up I can experiment more because the patch settings on the G2Nu are so easy to manipulate. I used to do likewise with the Magicstomp patches but almost inevitably returned to your original settings! For obvious reasons I don’t touch the Q2 settings and keep that on bypass when messing with the G2Nu patches. Regards Phil
|
|
|
Post by zager on Jul 22, 2010 21:00:54 GMT
Hi Phil, well done to you for posting the sound files for comparson. It good to hear what the new unit sounds like. I agree with you about not being as good as the magicstomp.Regards Tony
|
|
|
Post by twang46 on Jul 23, 2010 10:32:56 GMT
Hi Phil 2 well played posts that to me sound noticeably better than the G2. I see that you feel that the MStomp has the better echoes, I personally prefer the Zoom "sound" & have had 3 MStomps over the last couple of years & sold them all on I think it's good that we all don't hear the same things in these old recordings we love so much So, has the order of echo units changed any since the G2N has arrived ? or has the "N" just slotted in a fraction above the G2 ? Cheers Dick.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Hall on Jul 23, 2010 10:42:29 GMT
Hi Dick, I would place the G2Nu/G2.1Nu somewhere between the old G2/G2.1u and the Magicstomp, although the whole G2 range beats the Magicstomp for being able to do more things at the same time. Regards, Charlie
|
|
|
Post by loujones12 on Jul 23, 2010 10:49:38 GMT
Hi Phil. first off. very well played, and good tone. to my ears, all i think it realy needs is a little more Sustain on the notes. they seem to die off too soon, maybe this is part of the echo i don't know. but all in all vey well done . Regards Lou
|
|
|
Post by philbarker on Jul 23, 2010 13:12:21 GMT
Thanks to everyone above that has commented, particularly if the samples have been helpful. I did them using the most basic settings and was a little concerned that the sound was a bit, “flat” but I didn’t want to tart it up and give a false impression. I know we use varying methods to enhance our sounds and I think that’s where a lot of the fun (and frustration) is! I’m glad Stephen – shadsechoes – did one as well. And Dick I think you are quite right about the sounds being in the ear of the beholder!! Regards to everyone Phil
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2010 8:16:41 GMT
I've had a G2 for a long time as I use the distortions quite a lot also but I found if you; Enable comp and dial in either 2 to 4, (Gain knob) FS setting, (Tone knob) 80 mix'ish, (Level knob), the cascading echoes on the Vox amp (CA) sim become a tad thicker. Tony
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Hall on Jul 25, 2010 11:24:46 GMT
I used my G2.Nu at a gig last night. We played Apache and Wonderful Land. The guitar tone was very good on both but I felt that there was not enough echo on both. So I will be altering a number of the patches and sending out a new file to all customers to try out. I will try to do this later today. Regards, Charlie
|
|
|
Post by philbarker on Jul 29, 2010 11:07:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Hall on Jul 29, 2010 12:15:59 GMT
Hi Phil, I commented in the G2Nu update thread as well. Much better sound, but the dropouts are still there! Regards, Charlie
|
|
|
Post by martyn on Jul 30, 2010 0:00:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by les on Dec 10, 2010 14:45:44 GMT
Hi Phil, I commented in the G2Nu update thread as well. Much better sound, but the dropouts are still there! Regards, Charlie Charlie,I have just stumbled across your patches on a GU Nu, ............... Tone is great, ........... But does it need more echo,as there doesnt seem to be enough of that depthy echo slap ?.I ask because i might need to purchase one of these units to run your patches on, ............ ( Until something else comes up ! lol ) best wishes. les.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Hall on Dec 10, 2010 15:13:29 GMT
Hi Les, The patches were updated for more echo in most cases, soon after I wrote the original patches. I think they are pretty good now, within the limits of what the G2Nu/G2.1Nu is capable of. Regards, Charlie
|
|
|
Post by sammeh2 on Dec 18, 2010 0:29:22 GMT
I have just stumbled upon this site because I was looking on the web for some info on how to get a sound like the shadows, I had to take early retirement due to ill health and as an interest to past a long day thought I know!!! I'll do what I always wanted too, learn to play guitar, easier said than done I can tell you a lot harder when you're pushing 60. So got myself a Yamaha pacifica 112v fender 15 amp and a volume pedal and lo and behold did'nt sound like Hank Marvin more like Lee Marvin what I need is a digitech RP90 multi effect unit that will do the trick. I think not so I need all the help I can get and I hope this will be the place to get it. I am teaching myself slowly very slowly but what I was wondering is there any patches that can be put on my unil that is anywhere near the sound the Shadows make?
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Hall on Dec 18, 2010 0:42:22 GMT
Hi sammeh2, Welcome to the site. You will receive a lot of help and encouragement from many members here. The echo is the missing link in your system. I don't know the RP90 so I have no idea if it would be suitable or not. The Zoom G2Nu would be a good choice as you already have the volume pedal. The Zoom G2.1Nu has an expression pedal built in and I would have suggested that if you didn't already have a volume pedal. I sell the echo patches for these units for £25GBP. Meanwhile, if you already have the RP90 and it can do a single echo tap and reverb at the same time, set the delay to about 360 milliseconds, the feedback to give about 4 or 5 regenerations, set the reverb to around 2.5 to 3 seconds decay, if there is a predelay for the reverb, set that to about 100 miliseconds. Set the reverb as a background effect to the echo, not the other way round. Those settings might get you a bit nearer than you are at the moment for some of the Shadows tunes. Regards, Charlie
|
|
|
Post by sammeh2 on Dec 18, 2010 18:08:39 GMT
Thanks Charlie, I will give it a go and let you know how it pans out it's working out how the darn thing works which is the problem. Regards Sam
|
|
kenleo
Member
Has anyone got a zoom G5 for sale with EFTP patches Shadows
Posts: 18
|
Post by kenleo on Mar 5, 2015 22:13:23 GMT
Hi i have played Apache and Sleepwalk but if I could add a bit more reverb or echo it might sound more like the original Shadows recording. Do you have any advice with regards to adding echo or reverb to enhance the sound. Thankyou
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Hall on Mar 5, 2015 22:36:05 GMT
Hi kenleo, Mistake. Use your tremolo arm a bit more at the end of each phrase. That will probably do a lot more than messing about with adding more echo and/or reverb. Regards, Charlie
|
|