|
|
Post by stratomaster on May 16, 2010 22:10:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by richie on May 17, 2010 16:57:06 GMT
what is it?  ? ive just read it but didnt catch out? |
|
|
|
Post by Erik Feveile on May 17, 2010 19:42:52 GMT
Hi stratomaster, This is simply too crazy - How can Charlie Hall be mentioned as : "Charlie Paul" ? In my book it simply ain't right - Charlie,who has done all of his work with the EFTP-Programs,so that the man himself can rest easy,assured that his echo will come up on demand - just when he need it! It just isn't right to refer to Charlie Hall in this way!!!!!!!! Regards, Erik |
|
|
|
Post by tonybiker on May 17, 2010 20:21:18 GMT
A Swedish guy translating english, so Hall and Paul are pretty close! Hank knows exactly who Charlie is. Thought the praise Hank mounted on Charlie and co were the best I have read.
|
|
|
|
Post by stratomaster on May 17, 2010 20:39:57 GMT
A Swedish guy translating english, so Hall and Paul are pretty close! Hank knows exactly who Charlie is. Thought the praise Hank mounted on Charlie and co were the best I have read. Not close at all, I have to translate between two languages every day, and that is an unforgivable error to get a person's name that wrong. I'm sure Hank wasn't giving that interview in Swedish, so there should be no need for translating, just a competent proof reader. On the whole though, that interview was right on the money  |
|
|
|
Post by joeboy on May 20, 2010 13:54:12 GMT
Reading through that article, it all seems a bit rushed. I wouldn't be surprised if the Interview was recorded & then typed out to a deadline.
If you read through the article, it's as if the interviewer typed it out word for word as spoken by Hank.
I'm sure Hank would have referred to Charlie correctly, I'd also be surprised if this bothered Charlie in the slightest
An old interview too - 2002
|
|
? ive just read it but didnt catch out?
