|
Post by poppastarr on Jul 14, 2011 22:11:55 GMT
Hi John44
I apologise that I have only just realised I did not respond to your post above. Yep, it was the Echolette we were always striving to own. The first one in Canberra I ever heard was a band called the Casuals who had two friends of mine in the group. This was in very early 1963, my band the Ekos at the same time could only afford the Watkins copycat and mind you it wasn't bad at all I suppose in comparision it was like owning a Mercedes Benz and a Volkswagen. We got our first Echolette in 1964 in my band the Castaways. It was actually Charlie Hall that got me thinking about this. And I will be honest my ego was slightly deflated when through this thread I found that Hank did not use an Echolette. In our case in Australia it didn't matter and as you confirmed we didn't even know about the others. The funny thing is, in early 1970 a younger muso comrade told me he brought back a Binson echo from the States, I never heard of it and completly ingored the subject as in my mind ' It wasn't an echolette'. I can understand how your Echolette disappeard by some low life as many a muso in Canberra had the better gear stolen. I have some photos of a couple of bands in my town in the 60's using the klemt echolette. If you like for your curiosity I can post them on your private email for a look. Don't think I better clutter up this post.
Val
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Hall on Jul 14, 2011 22:22:39 GMT
I wouldn't say that the sound was never good live unless I went to every single live show the Shadows ever played. Regards, Charlie
|
|
|
Post by 26rednef on Jul 15, 2011 7:57:58 GMT
Hi.
I don't hear the same good sound on any of their live records or live performance, to me it is sounding as any band at that time, and I think they was much aware that. They had audience in the studio a couples of time and did live records there with a good studio sound. I have been at two live concerts with them and not been impressed by the sound, disappointed is a better word for it. No big deal it is history, and to me it can stay that way.
Kind Regards, 26rednef
|
|
|
Post by olsson on Jul 15, 2011 18:07:43 GMT
I must say that the ABC Kingston record is in my opinion as good as the studio made records, and the sound that I associate with The Shadows. /Bertil
|
|
|
Post by nessmonst on Jul 20, 2011 19:10:28 GMT
Just a quick observation on the Korg Stage Echo mentioned earlier in this thread. There are 2 distinctly different models --the SE300 & the SE500. The SE300 features a spring reverb the SE500 does not.The SE300 has 3 replay heads,the SE500 has 4 and it also features a sound on sound facility.The SE500 has added low impedance input/output connections to give enhanced performance when using with a desk. Both are fabulous machines and do the multi tap echo thing very nicely. I'm a little spoiled -I have 2 of each of them but my preference would be for the SE300 in spite of its supposedly 'simpler' build--to my ears it sounds so much livelier and more 'organic'(musical?) than its big brother. Regards to all David
|
|
|
Post by rockinscott on Jul 20, 2011 19:47:10 GMT
Hi David
I have to agree, i had a SE-300 and very much regret selling it. a great machine it was.
Scott
|
|
|
Post by didier on Jul 20, 2011 19:51:27 GMT
I must say that the ABC Kingston record is in my opinion as good as the studio made records, and the sound that I associate with The Shadows. /Bertil In my opinion it's even better, because it's live ! Didier
|
|
|
Post by john44 on Sept 29, 2011 4:30:58 GMT
Hi Again 26rednef I have been fortunate to have seen the Shadows live at four seperate concerts and venues and never left dissappointed .Particularly on the Cliff and Shadows reunited tour. I have seen and heard people acheive some great live sounds with a mixture of different units I heard one band useing two digitial delay units together one through the other two different repeats to acheive a very good sound especially the muted notes Cheers John44
|
|